Sounds like a rebellious teenager

Surely the reading was supposed to sound extremely inspiring, but -maybe it's just me or the fact that we're living in a time period much more "chill" per say about what people are now considering to be art- it seems like it becomes a bit, immature the more I read it. Like a rebellious teenager telling their parents to get off their back so that they can do what they think is "right" with just the little experience they have.

I understand the want of leaving the idea that every artist strives to have their pieces in museums, and that to expand on their own ideas and individual preferences, but going so far as to say that the buildings should be destroyed is pretty harsh. I believe that understanding the foundations of the different styles of "museum" art and their history helps us identify where these ideas in the first place come from. From there, the ideas of bending, but not quite breaking the rules can be performed while creating new styles of art.